![]() ![]() We shall examine Q uiroga's 'doble uso del horror', though no t from the same perspective as Etcheverry/, hi s handling of fanta sy elernents'', and the rea de r's resp onse to a ll of these. Rather, it is particularly forceful p iece of writing and Rub en Cotelo's critical judgment com pletely fails to take account of a number of elements present in the text of El almohad6n de plumas which enhance rather than detract from its effectiveness. Instead, w e prop ose to demonstrate that EI almohad6n de plumas is neith er torpe nor trivial. This essay will not d eal w it h the issue of authorial intentiona li ty. ![]() Pat ricia Anne Odber de Baub eta Unive rs ity of BirminghamĮl intento de Quiroga es torpe y trivial, y la perver si6n latent e en el tema se convierte en un mero esca lofrio s in rnisterio'. INTERTEXTUA LITIE S IN HORACIO QUIROGA'S EL ALMOH AD6N DE PLUMAS. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |